Home page -> Comparison -> City Index vs AvaTrade | Broker Comparison

City Index vs AvaTrade | Broker Comparison

Best trading broker comparisons. We compared City Index VS AvaTrade to see what key differences we could find.

Our goal was to create a side by side comparison of the approved brokers on wecomparebrokers to give you an at-a-glance overview of their features, broker details and fees. Our broker reviews and comparisons done by us testing accounts with real money and from the traders view point. You can also use our broker finder to look for a broker specific to your requirements.

Below is a comparison between City Index VS AvaTrade

In our testing, we used our trading accounts and ranked various points that we liked, did not like or were indifferent to. We tried to be objective and be fair minded when evaluating certain characteristics, based on what features the broker had to offer in compared with how competitive their fees are. Additionally, we have created our own unique rating system which use for judging all brokers in our side-by-side broker comparisons.

City Index Review

AvaTrade Review

Basic Information

Year Founded

First broker:

1983

Second broker:

2006

Headquarters Location

First broker:

UK (US Parent) + Global Offices

Second broker:

Ireland + 6 global offices

Publicly Traded (Entity or Parent)

First broker:

YES

Second broker:

YES

Regulated?

First broker:

YES

Second broker:

YES

Primary Regulator

First broker:

FCA

Second broker:

Central Bank of Ireland

Minimum Deposit

First broker:

£100

Second broker:

$100

Fixed Spreads?

First broker:

Second broker:

YES

Trading Type

First broker:

Market Maker

Second broker:

Market Maker

Commissions on Trades

First broker:

Second broker:

CFD Loss Rate

First broker:

72% loss rate on CFDs

Second broker:

71% loss rate on CFDs

Maximum Leverage

First broker:

1:30

Second broker:

1:400

Currency Pairs Offered

First broker:

Second broker:

General Average Rating - 3 scale

First broker:

2,28

Second broker:

2,16

Background

Value

Score

Value

Score

Year Founded

First broker:

1983

3,0

Second broker:

2006

3,0

Headquarters location + Offices

First broker:

UK (US Parent) + Global Offices

3,0

Second broker:

Ireland + 6 global offices

3,0

Publicly traded?

First broker:

Owned by GAIN Capital (Yes)

3,0

Second broker:

Private

2,0

Size Measure

First broker:

800+ employees worlwide

2,5

Second broker:

200,000 traders, $60 bil mo vol

2,0

Summary Score

First broker:

2,88

Second broker:

2,50

Regulatory Compliance

Value

Score

Value

Score

Regulated or unregulated?

First broker:

YES

3,0

Second broker:

YES

3,0

Primary regulator

First broker:

FCA

3,0

Second broker:

Central Bank of Ireland

3,0

Multiple compliance

First broker:

ASIC, Singapore, Dubai,

3,0

Second broker:

ASIC, Japan, British Virgin Islands

3,0

Safety of Deposits

First broker:

UK protect, no additional ins

2,5

Second broker:

Segregated accts + Ireland Insurance

2,5

Summary Score

First broker:

2,88

Second broker:

2,88

Fees & Charges

Value

Score

Value

Score

Commissions, Fees & Charges

First broker:

Average

2,0

Second broker:

None on some acct types

1,5

General

First broker:

High transparency, options fees?

2,0

Second broker:

Transparency, some hidden

1,5

Spreads

First broker:

Fixed and variable confusing

2,0

Second broker:

Avg to competitive by acct type

1,5

Summary Score

First broker:

2,00

Second broker:

1,50

Investment Products

Value

Score

Value

Score

Stocks - Breadth

First broker:

4 000

2,5

Second broker:

Broad based

2,0

Forex - Breadth

First broker:

Average

2,5

Second broker:

Average

2,5

Other: Comm, Crypto, Spread, CFD?

First broker:

Comm, Cryp, CFD, Spread Betting

3,0

Second broker:

Comm, Cryp, CFD, Optns, SB

3,0

Summary Score

First broker:

2,67

Second broker:

2,50

Platform experience

Value

Score

Value

Score

MT4 or equivalant

First broker:

MT4

3,0

Second broker:

MT4

3,0

Proprietary options

First broker:

Web and AT Pro platforms

2,5

Second broker:

ACT software + Options system

2,5

Special Advanced?

First broker:

Reuters feed, advanced tools

2,0

Second broker:

No mobile support for ACT

1,5

Summary Score

First broker:

2,50

Second broker:

2,33

Special Features

Value

Score

Value

Score

Feature A

First broker:

Still operates dealing desk

1,0

Second broker:

Mirror trade with Zulu, DupliTrade

2,5

Feature B

First broker:

No volume discounts

1,5

Second broker:

Fees based on acct type

1,5

Feature C

First broker:

No social trading

1,0

Second broker:

Auto-Chartist for $500 acct

1,5

Summary Score

First broker:

1,17

Second broker:

1,83

Research Tools/Guidance

Value

Score

Value

Score

Financial Commentary

First broker:

Above average research portal

2,5

Second broker:

Limited - video and You-Tube

1,5

Technical Anlaysis

First broker:

In-house analyst updates

2,5

Second broker:

Links for TA and FA

1,5

Other Guidance

First broker:

Trading ideas, stratagies

2,0

Second broker:

Some technical signals

1,5

Summary Score

First broker:

2,33

Second broker:

1,67

Education Support

Value

Score

Value

Score

Basic Library

First broker:

Basic to Broad coverage

2,0

Second broker:

Broad coverage

2,5

Webinars/Support

First broker:

Webinars, videos, articles

2,0

Second broker:

Begin, Inter, and Advanced covered

2,5

General

First broker:

72% loss rate on CFDs

1,5

Second broker:

71% loss rate on CFDs

1,5

Summary Score

First broker:

1,83

Second broker:

2,17

Customer Support

Value

Score

Value

Score

Live Chat, Web, Tele, Offices

First broker:

YES

3,0

Second broker:

YES + Int'l offices

3,0

Responsiveness

First broker:

Better than Average

2,5

Second broker:

Chat delayed

2,0

FAQs? Quality?

First broker:

More than adequate

2,5

Second broker:

More than adequate

2,5

Summary Score

First broker:

2,67

Second broker:

2,50

General Pros & Cons

Value

Score

Value

Score

Pro #1

First broker:

Competitive pricing

2,0

Second broker:

Social trading included

2,0

Pro #2

First broker:

Large product offering

2,5

Second broker:

Good educational focus

2,5

Pro #3

First broker:

Excellent training/support

2,5

Second broker:

Low fees for some accts

2,0

Con #1

First broker:

Focus on begin and mid-level

2,0

Second broker:

Focus on begin and mid-level

2,0

Con #2

First broker:

Advanced API integration weak

1,0

Second broker:

No news integration

1,0

Con #3

First broker:

No social trading

1,0

Second broker:

Still operates dealing desk

1,0

Summary Score

First broker:

1,83

Second broker:

1,75

General Average Rating - 3 scale

First broker:

2,28

Second broker:

2,16